Love-hate, love-brutality, love-violence

Improved grammar the 2020-07-21 at 17:29 o'clock. This article was published on www.amorism.cc the 2020-07-18 at 14:04 o'clock.

Here I am in armour
and amoristic wisdom.
Amorism is the only
or best dogmatics to
fully explain how
it is possible to love
enemies. Thus
amorism has the 
best explanations of 
Jesus Christ in this 
aspect as well.

Amorism® has the best (and holiest dogmatics and) terminology about love and benevolence. Amorism is pioneering philosophy; (we believe this after checking other leading philosophers). Some specific definitions of other philosophers must be rejected. Otherwise the chances to fully understand and explain the concept of love are diminished. According to Amorism it is possible (or the least bad) to be violent or brutal against anyone that oneself is loving. That may sometimes promote life and happines in the loved ones. According to Amorism the concept of love is wider than only kindness, friendship etc.. Therefore Amorism and our creed says: kindness is a not a sort of love; friendship is not a sort of love. Amorism reveals that kindness and friendship may be the "opposite" of total benevolence. But Amorism says that kindness and friendship may be love, namely if they build on benevolence. The Amoristic creed has the best (in the world) short definition of love. With love-brutality (and love-violence) I and Amorism do not mean "to love brutality". We do not glorify brutality nor violence. But these concepts are necessary to counteract bad defintions and to explain the full uniqueness and great usability of the concept of love.

Support our authorship
and amorism.

Amorism claims that brutality (or violence) may be necessary. And brutality (or violence) may even be righteous, namely if that is driven by total benevolence. But Amorism also says that butality (or violence) is never the most righteous. I mean: to truly love a person may sometimes include to be brutal to the person. Because according to Amorism love is to wish and to strive for the best for someone. Love-brutality may be unavoidable. To be able to use love-brutality may be better than to only be able to use kindness and "loving kindness". Loving violence och loving brutality clarifies the concept of love. Amorism (the dogmatics) stresses that loving kindness does not cover the whole meaning of the concept of love. The amorist definition is very short and written in our creed. It is brilliant and not confused by mentioning confusing factors that are non essential for love. Such factors are mentioned separately to differentiate confusing factors from the essence of all true love, namely benevolence according to the Amoristic creed. Therefore Amorism has better explanations of theodicy and theology. But Amorism does not depend on theology.

Amorism supports this in order to create better order in psychology and philosophy. Amoristic concepts as love-violence, love-brutality and love-hate are hyphenated for clarity. Otherwise they risk to be confused. Love-hate is called hatkärlek in Swedish. That is also best explained by Amorism and described in the book Amorism. Amorism creates better order in psychology and philosophy.







Links to hundreds of other articles on this site

Referenser och Länkar 

Symbol för amorism®
och Amoristerna.

till några (av de hundratals) artiklarna på www.amorism.cc. I en av länkarna kan du läsa om boken Amorism och gärna även köpa den. Även artikel om hur du ger gåvor till Amoristerna. Lista över länkarna, klicka här: Dessa länkar förklarar mera om amorism.

Vänliga hälsningar till alla från Fredrik och Amoristerna!

Jag är filosofen, grundaren och ledaren (biskop) i Amoristerna, kyrkan för amorism®.